DETECTLEAD · CASE STUDIES
Abatement crew foreman in a pre-1978 residential home — clearance documentation at a worksite.
Contractor case study · Alpine Construction · Northeast US

One kit. Ten inspections passed.
Then it ran out.

Ron Pike got a single Fluoro-Spec at a conference in 2024. What happened next is the whole pitch to HUD grantees in one story.

First-run passes
10
Kit used
1
Failure after ran out
1
Reorder
~$300

How he got the kit.

Spring 2024. Ron Pike, owner of Alpine Construction, a Northeast RRP/abatement crew, went to the National Lead and Healthy Homes Conference. I handed him a Fluoro-Spec kit on the exhibit floor. Free sample. He took it home in a work bag alongside the rest of the conference swag.

What happened on the first ten jobs.

Ron started using it on his abatement jobs. Just at the end of a clean, before the clearance wipe-test team came. Spray the floor, shine the 365 nm UV, look for any remaining lead-paint dust. If you see a glow, clean it again. If you don't, you're done.

First time out, they passed the clearance wipe. Then again. Then again.

Ten inspections in a row. Zero failures. All on the first attempt.

The economics of that are dramatic for an abatement contractor. A failed clearance wipe means you come back, HEPA vacuum again, wet-wipe again, re-test, sometimes twice. Labor hours eating the job's margin. A passed first-round wipe means you bill, you leave, you book the next job.

Then it ran out.

Eventually the bottle was empty. Ron didn't reorder immediately. The next job, no Fluoro-Spec in the toolkit. End of the clean, the wipe-test team came in. Failure.

He had to come back. HEPA again, wet-wipe again, re-test. Labor hours that weren't budgeted.

The reorder tells the story.

The very next day, Alpine Construction ordered approximately $300 of Fluoro-Spec. I didn't find out it was working until I saw the order come through and called Ron to thank him. That's when he told me about the ten inspections.

The order itself is the testimonial. A commercial crew doesn't spend $300 on a consumable from a conference sample unless that consumable paid for itself already.

Seeing individual particles of lead-based paint dust is exceedingly valuable to abatement contractors, especially given the lowering of the dust hazard standards by the EPA.
, Ron Pike, Alpine Construction

Why this matters for your grant program.

Ron is one contractor. But the dynamic he describes is the whole dust-wipe-pass-rate problem for HUD LHC grantees at the unit level:

  • Every failed clearance wipe costs a second visit. That's labor, scheduling, tenant disruption.
  • The 2024 EPA dust hazard standards dropped 87.5%. The old floor was 10 µg/ft²; the new floor is 5 µg/ft² for floors, 40 µg/ft² for windowsills (was 100). Crews who used to pass by eye are now failing.
  • A consumable that prevents re-visits pays for itself in one avoided failure. Alpine's $300 reorder was probably less than a single labor-hour overrun on a failed clearance.
  • The 100 free Fluoro-Spec kits offer to HUD grantees puts this tool in the hands of your contractors at zero cost. Their pass rate goes up. Your grant reports get better. Tenants move back in faster.
The lesson in one line

The sample went home in a conference bag. Ten inspections later, Alpine was a customer. The product is the pitch, you just have to let contractors try it.

Run a HUD lead hazard program?

The 100-kit offer puts Fluoro-Spec in your contractors' hands at zero cost. Apply in five minutes:

Explore more
🔨 Alpine Construction 📋 EBLL Case Studies 🏛 Grantees Program Contractor Portal 🗺 All Pages
🔨

Contractor lead quiz

3 questions every renovator in a pre-1978 home should be able to answer.

Contractor lead quiz
Question 1 of 3

Before starting any renovation in a pre-1978 home, a contractor should:

Test first. EPA RRP (40 CFR Part 745) requires testing or presuming lead is present before disturbing painted surfaces in pre-1978 housing. Knowing which surfaces have lead lets you set up proper containment, and proves due diligence.
Question 2 of 3

Why is disturbing intact lead paint more dangerous than leaving it alone?

Intact lead paint is relatively stable. Sanding or cutting fragments it into particles so fine they stay airborne for hours, then settle invisibly on floors, HVAC vents, and surfaces where crawling children spend their days, and stay there for years.
Question 3 of 3

After a Fluoro-Spec positive on painted trim, what's the correct next step?

Fluoro-Spec is a screening tool. A positive means lead is likely present, confirm with XRF or lab analysis, then follow EPA RRP Part 745: containment, HEPA vacuuming, wet wiping, and dust-wipe clearance testing before reopening the space.
correct

Get the kit →