TWO HOMES · ONE METHOD

The home test would have
come first.

Both families had the source already in the house. Both blood results came back over the action level. Both could have been caught with the kit in a drawer.

2homes documented
1open-source method
reusable kits
01

EBLL · case A.

Pre-1978 rental. Freshly painted. New tenants. Two children under 5. The painting concealed a chalking under-layer the inspector never tested.

The unit was beautiful. The lead inspector signed off on the visible trim. The crawl-space sub-floor was the source. Six months later the four-year-old came back at 11 µg/dL.

— EBLL Case A
02

EBLL · case B.

Two-story farmhouse. Grandparents' visit weekend. The dishes pulled out for the dinner were vintage hand-painted folk pieces. The acidic-tomato roast and the painted glaze gave a 32 µg/kg dose in one sitting for the toddler.

!

Decorated dishes + hot or acidic food.

The most-missed pediatric source in the dataset. The ceramic is fine on display. It is not fine under tomato sauce.

03

The common arc.

01

A subtle symptom.

Behavior change. Sleep change. Pediatrician orders the blood test.

02

A surprise result.

5-11 µg/dL. Parents had no candidate source in mind.

03

The hunt.

EBLL case worker visits. Dust wipes, paint chips, soil samples. The source was already in the house.

04

Years of remediation.

Blood half-life is months to years. The IQ damage does not reverse.